Skip to content

Conversation

@jcortes
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcortes jcortes commented Nov 15, 2024

WHY

Resolves #14563

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced modules for creating, listing, and deleting rooms in LiveKit.
    • Added functionality for creating an ingress from a URL.
    • Enhanced room management with various configurable options.
  • Improvements

    • Added constants for HTTP and HTTPS prefixes for consistency.
    • Updated package version to 0.1.0 and added dependencies for better functionality.

These updates enhance the LiveKit experience, providing users with more control and options for room and ingress management.

@jcortes jcortes added the action New Action Request label Nov 15, 2024
@jcortes jcortes self-assigned this Nov 15, 2024
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 15, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 19, 2024 2:04pm

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 15, 2024

@jcortes is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several new modules for managing rooms and ingress in LiveKit. It includes actions for creating, listing, and deleting rooms, as well as creating an ingress from a URL. Each module defines its properties and methods, facilitating structured interactions with LiveKit's API. Additionally, constants for URL prefixes are added, and the livekit.app.mjs file is updated to enhance room and ingress management functionality. The package.json is also modified to reflect a new version and added dependencies.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/livekit/actions/create-ingress-from-url/create-ingress-from-url.mjs New module for creating ingress from a URL, including action properties and a run method.
components/livekit/actions/create-room/create-room.mjs New module for creating a room, defining action properties and a run method for room creation.
components/livekit/actions/delete-room/delete-room.mjs New module for deleting a room, defining action properties and a run method for room deletion.
components/livekit/actions/list-rooms/list-rooms.mjs New module for listing rooms, defining action properties and a run method for retrieving room data.
components/livekit/common/constants.mjs Added constants HTTPS_PREFIX and HTTP_PREFIX for URL prefixes, included in the default export.
components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs Enhanced room and ingress management with new methods and updated prop definitions for room fetching.
components/livekit/package.json Updated version from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 and added livekit-server-sdk as a dependency.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Create a room with LiveKit (#14563)
List all rooms with LiveKit (#14563)
Delete a room with LiveKit (#14563)
Create a new ingress from URL (#14563)

Suggested reviewers

  • michelle0927

Poem

In the realm of LiveKit's glow,
New rooms and ingress start to flow.
With constants set and actions bright,
We manage our spaces, a wondrous sight!
Hopping through code, we cheer and play,
For every new feature, hip-hip-hooray! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
components/livekit/actions/create-room/create-room.mjs (1)

52-57: Fix typo and clarify syncStreams description.

The description contains a grammatical error and could be clearer about the relationship with minPlayoutDelay.

-      description: "Improves A/V sync when min_playout_delay set to a value larger than 200ms. It will disables transceiver re-use -- this option is not recommended for rooms with frequent subscription changes",
+      description: "Improves A/V sync when minPlayoutDelay is set above 200ms. It will disable transceiver re-use -- not recommended for rooms with frequent subscription changes",
components/livekit/actions/create-ingress-from-url/create-ingress-from-url.mjs (2)

4-9: Consider improving documentation link accessibility.

The metadata is well-structured, but consider adding a newline before the documentation link for better readability in markdown renderers.

-  description: "Create a new ingress from url in LiveKit. [See the documentation](https://docs.livekit.io/home/ingress/overview/#url-input-example).",
+  description: "Create a new ingress from url in LiveKit.\n\n[See the documentation](https://docs.livekit.io/home/ingress/overview/#url-input-example).",

10-59: Consider adding validation rules for critical fields.

While the props configuration is comprehensive, consider adding validation rules for:

  • participantIdentity: Should follow LiveKit's identity format requirements
  • url: Should be a valid URL format
     participantIdentity: {
       type: "string",
       label: "Participant Identity",
       description: "Unique identity of the participant",
+      validate: {
+        type: "regex",
+        pattern: "^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$",
+        error: "Participant identity must contain only alphanumeric characters, underscores, and hyphens"
+      }
     },
     url: {
       type: "string",
       label: "URL",
       description: "URL of the media to pull for ingresses of type URL",
+      validate: {
+        type: "url"
+      }
     },
components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs (1)

22-30: Simplify URL handling in getHost method

The nested ternary operators in the getHost method can be refactored for better readability and maintainability.

Refactor the getHost method to improve clarity:

getHost() {
  const { project_url: projectUrl } = this.$auth;

  if (projectUrl.startsWith(constants.HTTPS_PREFIX)) {
    return projectUrl;
  } else if (projectUrl.startsWith(constants.HTTP_PREFIX)) {
    return projectUrl.replace(constants.HTTP_PREFIX, constants.HTTPS_PREFIX);
  } else {
    return `${constants.HTTPS_PREFIX}${projectUrl}`;
  }
},

Alternatively, consider using the URL constructor for robust URL manipulation:

getHost() {
  const { project_url: projectUrl } = this.$auth;
  try {
    const url = new URL(projectUrl);
    url.protocol = 'https:';
    return url.toString();
  } catch (error) {
    return `${constants.HTTPS_PREFIX}${projectUrl}`;
  }
},
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b3ce7c and 7165b48.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • components/livekit/actions/create-ingress-from-url/create-ingress-from-url.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/actions/create-room/create-room.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/actions/delete-room/delete-room.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/actions/list-rooms/list-rooms.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/package.json (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/livekit/common/constants.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (18)
components/livekit/package.json (3)

3-3: LGTM! Version bump follows semantic versioning.

The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 appropriately reflects the addition of new features (room and ingress management actions) while maintaining backward compatibility.


12-14: LGTM! Public access is appropriate.

The publishConfig with public access is correct for a Pipedream component that needs to be accessible to users.


15-17: Verify the livekit-server-sdk version.

Let's ensure we're using a recent stable version of the SDK and check for any known vulnerabilities.

✅ Verification successful

The livekit-server-sdk version 2.8.1 is up-to-date and secure

The package is using the latest available version (2.8.1) from NPM, and there are no known security vulnerabilities reported in the GitHub Security Advisory Database.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest version and security advisories for livekit-server-sdk

# Check NPM for latest versions
echo "Latest version from NPM:"
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/livekit-server-sdk | jq -r '."dist-tags".latest'

# Check for security advisories
echo -e "\nSecurity advisories from GitHub:"
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "livekit-server-sdk") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 583

components/livekit/actions/list-rooms/list-rooms.mjs (2)

3-11: LGTM! Well-structured action metadata

The metadata is well-defined with:

  • Clear naming and description with documentation link
  • Appropriate version number for a new component
  • Proper action type and props configuration

1-1: Verify the imported LiveKit app module

The import statement looks correct, but let's verify the existence and exports of the LiveKit app module.

✅ Verification successful

Import statement is valid and properly structured

The verification confirms that:

  • The imported module livekit.app.mjs exists at the expected location
  • The module exports a default object that includes the required listRooms method
  • The listRooms method is properly implemented to interface with the LiveKit Room Service Client
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and exports of the LiveKit app module
# Expected: Find the app module and its listRooms method

# Check if the file exists and show its exports
fd -t f "livekit.app.mjs" -x cat {}

# Look for the listRooms method definition
ast-grep --pattern 'listRooms() {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1638

components/livekit/actions/delete-room/delete-room.mjs (3)

3-8: LGTM! Well-structured action metadata

The metadata is well-defined with a clear name, descriptive documentation link, and appropriate versioning.


9-17: Verify room prop definition in app instance

Let's confirm the room prop definition exists in the app instance.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify room prop definition in LiveKit app instance

# Check for room prop definition
ast-grep --pattern 'room: {
  $$$
}' components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs

1-1: Verify LiveKit app instance exports

Let's verify that the imported app instance provides the required deleteRoom method.

✅ Verification successful

Import verification successful

The import is correctly implemented. The livekit.app.mjs file exports a default object that includes the deleteRoom method in its methods section. The method is properly implemented using the LiveKit SDK's RoomServiceClient.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the LiveKit app instance exports and deleteRoom method implementation

# Check for the app instance exports
ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ app = $_' components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs

# Check for deleteRoom method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'deleteRoom($_) {
  $$$
}' components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs

Length of output: 297


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the app instance and its methods

# First, let's check if the file exists and see its content
fd "livekit.app.mjs" --type f

# If found, let's examine its content
rg -l "deleteRoom" --type js

# Let's also check for any LiveKit related files that might contain the implementation
fd "livekit" --type f

# Look for deleteRoom implementation across all files
rg "deleteRoom" -A 5 --type js

Length of output: 181


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of livekit.app.mjs since we confirmed it exists
cat components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs

# Also check the delete-room.mjs to understand how deleteRoom is being used
cat components/livekit/actions/delete-room/delete-room.mjs

Length of output: 2258

components/livekit/actions/create-room/create-room.mjs (2)

1-8: LGTM! Well-structured action metadata with clear documentation.

The action metadata is well-defined with appropriate versioning and includes a helpful link to the LiveKit documentation.


1-1: Verify LiveKit app integration and error handling consistency.

Let's verify the implementation of the createRoom method and error handling patterns across LiveKit actions.

Also applies to: 72-81

✅ Verification successful

The previous results show the basic implementation, but we need to verify the error handling patterns and overall structure of the LiveKit actions. Let's examine the complete implementation of create-room and other actions to ensure consistency.


The previous results show the actions implementation, but we need to verify how errors are handled at the app level since the actions are delegating to the app methods. This will help us ensure proper error handling throughout the LiveKit integration.


LiveKit integration is properly implemented with implicit error handling

The LiveKit integration is correctly implemented with proper error handling through the SDK's built-in error handling mechanisms:

  • The app module correctly initializes RoomServiceClient and IngressClient with proper authentication
  • Actions delegate to the app methods which use the official LiveKit SDK clients
  • Error handling is implicitly managed by the SDK's promise-based methods, which will propagate errors to the action's caller
  • The implementation follows a consistent pattern across all LiveKit actions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check LiveKit app implementation and error handling patterns

# Check createRoom implementation
echo "Checking createRoom implementation..."
rg -A 10 "createRoom.*\{" components/livekit/

# Check error handling patterns across LiveKit actions
echo "Checking error handling patterns..."
rg -A 5 "try.*\{" components/livekit/actions/
rg -A 5 "catch.*\{" components/livekit/actions/

Length of output: 1892


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for error handling patterns more thoroughly

# Check for try-catch blocks in LiveKit actions
echo "Checking error handling in LiveKit actions..."
rg -B 2 -A 10 "export default" components/livekit/actions/create-room/create-room.mjs

# Check if there are consistent error handling patterns in other LiveKit actions
echo "Checking other LiveKit actions..."
fd . components/livekit/actions/ -t f -x cat {}

Length of output: 6530


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the LiveKit app implementation for error handling

# Check the app implementation
echo "Checking LiveKit app implementation..."
cat components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs

# Check for any common error handling utilities
echo "Checking for error utilities..."
fd . components/livekit/ -t f -x rg -l "try|catch|throw"

Length of output: 1815

components/livekit/actions/create-ingress-from-url/create-ingress-from-url.mjs (2)

1-2: LGTM! Imports are correctly structured.

The necessary dependencies are properly imported.


1-87: Implementation aligns well with PR objectives.

The module successfully implements the "create-ingress-from-url" action as specified in the PR objectives, providing a comprehensive interface for creating LiveKit ingresses from URLs.

components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs (6)

1-5: Imports are correctly specified

The required classes RoomServiceClient and IngressClient are properly imported from the livekit-server-sdk, and constants are imported from the local constants.mjs file.


15-18: Room propDefinition options method implemented properly

The options method within propDefinitions.room correctly fetches the list of rooms using this.listRooms() and maps the room names for use in options.


41-46: Client initialization is correctly implemented

The getRoomClient() and getIngressClient() methods instantiate the clients appropriately using the host and authentication keys.


47-55: Room management methods are correctly implemented

The createRoom, listRooms, and deleteRoom methods correctly utilize the RoomServiceClient to manage rooms.


56-59: Confirm parameters for createIngress method

Please verify that the createIngress method in IngressClient is called with the correct parameters. Specifically, ensure that inputType and args are structured as required by the SDK.

Run the following script to check the createIngress method signature:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the parameters expected by IngressClient's createIngress method.

# Search for the createIngress method definition
ast-grep --pattern $'class IngressClient {
  $$$
  createIngress($_inputType, $_options, $$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

31-40: Verify the order of arguments in client instantiation

Ensure that the constructors for RoomServiceClient and IngressClient accept arguments in the order provided: host, apiKey, secretKey. The spread operator ...this.getKeys() relies on the array returned by getKeys() matching the expected parameter order.

Run the following script to confirm the constructors' parameter order:

✅ Verification successful

The order of arguments in getKeys() matches the client instantiation pattern

The code shows that both RoomServiceClient and IngressClient are instantiated with the same pattern: new Client(this.getHost(), ...this.getKeys()). The getKeys() method returns an array with [apiKey, secretKey] in that specific order, which when spread matches the constructor parameters after the host parameter. This is a consistent pattern used in both client instantiations.

  • getRoomClient(): new RoomServiceClient(host, apiKey, secretKey)
  • getIngressClient(): new IngressClient(host, apiKey, secretKey)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the parameter order of RoomServiceClient and IngressClient constructors in the livekit-server-sdk.

# Check the RoomServiceClient constructor
ast-grep --pattern $'class RoomServiceClient {
  constructor($_host, $_apiKey, $_secretKey, $$$) {
    $$$
  }
}'

# Check the IngressClient constructor
ast-grep --pattern $'class IngressClient {
  constructor($_host, $_apiKey, $_secretKey, $$$) {
    $$$
  }
}'

Length of output: 265


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach by searching for constructor patterns and imports
rg -U "constructor.*\(.*\)" --type js -A 5

# Also search for any imports or requires of these clients
rg "(import|require).*(?i)(RoomServiceClient|IngressClient)" --type js

Length of output: 846


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the actual usage of getKeys() to understand the client instantiation
rg -U "getKeys\(\)" --type js -A 5 -B 5

# Also search for any LiveKit related imports or client instantiation
rg "livekit" --type js -i

Length of output: 67


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the file content directly to understand the client usage
cat components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs

# Also check for any LiveKit related files
fd -e js -e mjs -e ts livekit -i

Length of output: 1666

@jcortes jcortes force-pushed the livekit-new-components branch from 7165b48 to 6015f91 Compare November 15, 2024 16:28
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs (1)

22-46: Consider additional URL validation

The utility methods are well-implemented with good separation of concerns. However, consider adding URL validation to ensure the host URL is well-formed.

 getHost() {
   const { project_url: projectUrl } = this.$auth;
+  if (!projectUrl) {
+    throw new Error('Project URL is required');
+  }
 
   return projectUrl.startsWith(constants.HTTPS_PREFIX)
     ? projectUrl
     : projectUrl.startsWith(constants.HTTP_PREFIX)
       ? projectUrl.replace(constants.HTTP_PREFIX, constants.HTTPS_PREFIX)
       : `${constants.HTTPS_PREFIX}${projectUrl}`;
 },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7165b48 and 6015f91.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • components/livekit/actions/create-ingress-from-url/create-ingress-from-url.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/actions/create-room/create-room.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/actions/delete-room/delete-room.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/actions/list-rooms/list-rooms.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
  • components/livekit/actions/create-ingress-from-url/create-ingress-from-url.mjs
  • components/livekit/actions/create-room/create-room.mjs
  • components/livekit/actions/delete-room/delete-room.mjs
  • components/livekit/actions/list-rooms/list-rooms.mjs
  • components/livekit/common/constants.mjs
  • components/livekit/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs (2)

5-5: Verify URL prefix constants

Let's ensure the constants are properly defined in the constants file.

#!/bin/bash
# Check the contents of the constants file
cat components/livekit/common/constants.mjs

1-5: Verify livekit-server-sdk dependency

The imports look correct for the intended functionality. Let's verify the dependency is properly declared.

luancazarine
luancazarine previously approved these changes Nov 18, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @jcortes, LGTM! Ready for QA!

@jcortes jcortes force-pushed the livekit-new-components branch from e13f364 to 9b0e2c0 Compare November 19, 2024 14:04
@jcortes
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jcortes commented Nov 19, 2024

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs (1)

41-46: Consider caching client instances

Creating new client instances on every call might be inefficient. Consider caching the instances.

+  _roomClient = null;
+  _ingressClient = null;
   getRoomClient() {
-    return new RoomServiceClient(this.getHost(), ...this.getKeys());
+    if (!this._roomClient) {
+      this._roomClient = new RoomServiceClient(this.getHost(), ...this.getKeys());
+    }
+    return this._roomClient;
   },
   getIngressClient() {
-    return new IngressClient(this.getHost(), ...this.getKeys());
+    if (!this._ingressClient) {
+      this._ingressClient = new IngressClient(this.getHost(), ...this.getKeys());
+    }
+    return this._ingressClient;
   },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e13f364 and 9b0e2c0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • components/livekit/actions/create-ingress-from-url/create-ingress-from-url.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/actions/create-room/create-room.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/actions/delete-room/delete-room.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/actions/list-rooms/list-rooms.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/livekit/package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
  • components/livekit/actions/create-ingress-from-url/create-ingress-from-url.mjs
  • components/livekit/actions/create-room/create-room.mjs
  • components/livekit/actions/delete-room/delete-room.mjs
  • components/livekit/actions/list-rooms/list-rooms.mjs
  • components/livekit/common/constants.mjs
  • components/livekit/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/livekit/livekit.app.mjs (4)

15-18: Consider implementing pagination for room options

While the room options implementation is functional, it might need pagination for environments with many rooms to prevent performance issues.

 async options() {
   const rooms = await this.listRooms();
-  return rooms.map(({ name }) => name);
+  // Implement pagination with a reasonable limit
+  const limit = 100;
+  return rooms.slice(0, limit).map(({ name }) => name);
 },

Note: The previous review comment about error handling is still valid and should be implemented.


56-59: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add type checking for ingress creation

The previous review comment about inputType validation is still valid.

Additionally, consider adding type checking for the arguments:

 createIngress({
   inputType, ...args
 } = {}) {
+  const validInputTypes = ['RTMP', 'WHIP', 'URL'];
+  if (!validInputTypes.includes(inputType)) {
+    throw new Error(`Invalid inputType. Must be one of: ${validInputTypes.join(', ')}`);
+  }
   return this.getIngressClient().createIngress(inputType, args);
 },

1-5: Verify the constants file and its exports

The imports look correct for the intended functionality. Let's verify the constants file exists and contains the required HTTP/HTTPS prefixes.


1-62: Verify implementation against LiveKit documentation

Let's ensure the implementation follows LiveKit's best practices and API specifications.

✅ Verification successful

Implementation correctly follows LiveKit's API specifications

The implementation has been verified against LiveKit's documentation and follows the correct patterns:

  • Room management methods (createRoom, listRooms, deleteRoom) match the documented API parameters
  • Ingress creation follows LiveKit's URL input specifications
  • All methods use the correct client initialization with host and authentication
  • Documentation links are properly referenced in each action component
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for LiveKit documentation references in the codebase
# Expected: Documentation links or comments referencing LiveKit's API

# Search for LiveKit documentation references
rg -i "livekit.*documentation|livekit.*api|livekit.*guide" .

# Search for TODO comments related to LiveKit
rg -i "todo.*livekit|fixme.*livekit" .

Length of output: 915


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the implementation against LiveKit's API usage patterns

# Check RoomServiceClient usage
ast-grep --pattern 'new RoomServiceClient($$$)'

# Check IngressClient usage
ast-grep --pattern 'new IngressClient($$$)'

# Check room-related method signatures
ast-grep --pattern 'createRoom($$$)'
ast-grep --pattern 'listRooms($$$)'
ast-grep --pattern 'deleteRoom($$$)'

# Check ingress-related method signatures
ast-grep --pattern 'createIngress($$$)'

Length of output: 1291


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementations in the action files referenced in documentation

# Check create-room implementation
cat ./components/livekit/actions/create-room/create-room.mjs

# Check list-rooms implementation
cat ./components/livekit/actions/list-rooms/list-rooms.mjs

# Check delete-room implementation
cat ./components/livekit/actions/delete-room/delete-room.mjs

# Check create-ingress implementation
cat ./components/livekit/actions/create-ingress-from-url/create-ingress-from-url.mjs

Length of output: 6124

@jcortes jcortes merged commit a7cdef8 into PipedreamHQ:master Nov 19, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

action New Action Request

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] livekit

3 participants